![]() ![]() ![]() Not going for a dread subscription where you lose everything when you unsubscrine, but you can still support the developer in the long said: To be honest, this is my favourite payment "model" in the app store. You just stop receiving updates after one year. It's basically a lot like a subscription model, but with the huge benefit of getting to keep the full version even after you stop subscribing. But equally there's zero pressure to upgrade to the new version if you're happy with the existing feature set Wotja 20 will continue to work for years after it's removed from the store next week and will remain usable as a separate app. There's also, for those who prefer subs, a single subscription version which rolls over from year to year. Far from being the same app every year, each year's version drops with a new feature set and new presets, and the annual product cycle sees additional major features introduced in the course of the year (last year notably the pattern sequence editor and mix-level scripting). Those 50 updates are more than most apps see in their entire lifecycle. Well, the point is to support rapid and aggressive development. ![]() But equally there's zero pressure to upgrade to the new version if you're happy with the existing feature set Wotja 20 will continue to work for years after it's removed from the store next week and will remain usable as a separate said: If the previous version had 50 updates perhaps the developer should release the "new" version as a 51st update instead. Can someone explain to me what is the idea (except an obvious marketing reason) of releasing basically the same app every year with a separate price tag? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |